South Africa was received yesterday by the President, at a hearing at the end of the day that served to explain personally to the Head of State all it knows about the case LBW. At the exit, the entrepreneur and former minister had a decision: it will keep the seat in the Council of State.
"After the return [of a travel abroad] asked for a hearing to the President of the Republic" - South Africa confirmed the Economic Daily. "Communicate to him that all my activity in the SLN was that I thoroughly explained in the interview to RTP and that therefore not committed any illegality in the exercise of my duties. From what I see no reason to give up my responsibilities as Counselor of State. "
The decision of South Africa, however, is not universally accepted in their own PSD. Yesterday, even before the leader of the PSD has said that the decision belonged only to South Africa itself to be an issue "of court personnel," the President of the Jurisdiction of the party, Nuno Morais Sarmento, came to public - in the " Speaking Of course "on Radio Renaissance - pointing the way to the exit of former minister of the post of adviser to the president:" Both noise it [South Africa] did that after all this dust raised, I see with difficulty that he can be kept in the Council of State. It is a personal opinion, I, in place of South Africa, would raise to the Council of State and defend the President. "
Yesterday morning, the President of the Republic was asked about this same issue. In a visit to Sines in the Algarve, questions remained about confidence in South Africa, Cavaco Silva preferred to refer to the reading of the legislation itself on the national advice of the Head of State. A law that many experts say does not allow the resignation of an adviser, with an output dependent on a request for dismissal. Still, the view is not unanimous.
James Duarte, a professor of constitutional law at the New University, says that in this respect "is not explicitly mentioned in the law that possibility [of the President to dismiss an adviser to state], but it is not expressly prohibited. It is a dubious question but I believe that the President is free to dismiss the case if miss this relationship of trust. The most likely is that I believe the President should you lose this relationship of trust, talk to your counselor and abandon this. "In case this did not happen yesterday.
"After the return [of a travel abroad] asked for a hearing to the President of the Republic" - South Africa confirmed the Economic Daily. "Communicate to him that all my activity in the SLN was that I thoroughly explained in the interview to RTP and that therefore not committed any illegality in the exercise of my duties. From what I see no reason to give up my responsibilities as Counselor of State. "
The decision of South Africa, however, is not universally accepted in their own PSD. Yesterday, even before the leader of the PSD has said that the decision belonged only to South Africa itself to be an issue "of court personnel," the President of the Jurisdiction of the party, Nuno Morais Sarmento, came to public - in the " Speaking Of course "on Radio Renaissance - pointing the way to the exit of former minister of the post of adviser to the president:" Both noise it [South Africa] did that after all this dust raised, I see with difficulty that he can be kept in the Council of State. It is a personal opinion, I, in place of South Africa, would raise to the Council of State and defend the President. "
Yesterday morning, the President of the Republic was asked about this same issue. In a visit to Sines in the Algarve, questions remained about confidence in South Africa, Cavaco Silva preferred to refer to the reading of the legislation itself on the national advice of the Head of State. A law that many experts say does not allow the resignation of an adviser, with an output dependent on a request for dismissal. Still, the view is not unanimous.
James Duarte, a professor of constitutional law at the New University, says that in this respect "is not explicitly mentioned in the law that possibility [of the President to dismiss an adviser to state], but it is not expressly prohibited. It is a dubious question but I believe that the President is free to dismiss the case if miss this relationship of trust. The most likely is that I believe the President should you lose this relationship of trust, talk to your counselor and abandon this. "In case this did not happen yesterday.
No comments:
Post a Comment